2015-01-23 16:56:17 UTC

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Download PDF

 
 

These recommendations are based on the following: (1) a formal review and analysis of the recently published world literature on the topic [Medline search up to June 2011]; (2) the American College of Physicians' Manual for Assessing Health Practices and Designing Practice Guidelines;1 (3) guideline policies of the three societies approving this document; and (4) the experience of the authors and independent reviewers with regards to NAFLD.

Intended for use by physicians and allied health professionals, these recommendations suggest preferred approaches to the diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive aspects of care. They are intended to be flexible and adjustable for individual patients. Specific recommendations are evidence-based wherever possible, and when such evidence is not available or inconsistent, recommendations are made based on the consensus opinion of the authors. To best characterize the evidence cited in support of the recommendations, the AASLD Practice Guidelines Committee has adopted the classification used by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) workgroup with minor modifications (Table 1).2 The strength of recommendations in the GRADE system is classified as strong (1) or weak (2). The quality of evidence supporting strong or weak recommendations is designated by one of three levels: high (A), moderate (B) or low-quality (C).2 This is a practice guideline for clinicians rather than a review article and interested readers can refer to several comprehensive reviews published recently.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Table 1. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)

  Criteria
Strength of Recommendation  
Strong [1] Factors influencing the strength of the recommendation included the quality of the evidence, presumed patient-important outcomes, and cost
Weak [2] Variability in preferences and values, or more uncertainty. Recommendation is made with less certainty, higher cost or resource consumption
Quality of Evidence  
High [A] Further research is unlikely to change confidence in the estimate of the clinical effect
Moderate [B] Further research may change confidence in the estimate of the clinical effect
Low [C] Further research is very likely to impact confidence on the estimate of clinical effect

Definitions 

The definition of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) requires that (a) there is evidence of hepatic steatosis, either by imaging or by histology and (b) there are no causes for secondary hepatic fat accumulation such as significant alcohol consumption, use of steatogenic medication or hereditary disorders (Table 2). In the majority of patients, NAFLD is associated with metabolic risk factors such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia. NAFLD is histologically further categorized into nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (Table 3). NAFL is defined as the presence of hepatic steatosis with no evidence of hepatocellular injury in the form of ballooning of the hepatocytes. NASH is defined as the presence of hepatic steatosis and inflammation with hepatocyte injury (ballooning) with or without fibrosis.

Table 2. Common Causes of Secondary Hepatic Steatosis

- Macrovesicular steatosis
- Excessive alcohol consumption
- Hepatitis C (genotype 3)
- Wilson's disease
- Lipodystrophy
- Starvation
- Parenteral nutrition
- Abetalipoproteinemia
- Medications (e.g., amiodarone, methotrexate, tamoxifen, corticosteroids)
- Microvesicular steatosis
- Reye's syndrome
- Medications (valproate, anti-retroviral medicines)
- Acute fatty liver of pregnancy
- HELLP syndrome
- Inborn errors of metabolism (e.g., LCAT deficiency, cholesterol ester storage disease, Wolman disease)

Table 3. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Related Definitions

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Encompasses the entire spectrum of fatty liver disease in individuals without significant alcohol consumption, ranging from fatty liver to steatohepatitis and cirrhosis.
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver (NAFL) Presence of hepatic steatosis with no evidence of hepatocellular injury in the form of ballooning of the hepatocytes or no evidence of fibrosis. The risk of progression to cirrhosis and liver failure is minimal.
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) Presence of hepatic steatosis and inflammation with hepatocyte injury (ballooning) with or without fibrosis. This can progress to cirrhosis, liver failure and rarely liver cancer.
NASH Cirrhosis Presence of cirrhosis with current or previous histological evidence of steatosis or steatohepatitis
Cryptogenic Cirrhosis Presence of cirrhosis with no obvious etiology. Patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis are heavily enriched with metabolic risk factors such as obesity and metabolic syndrome.
NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) An unweighted composite of steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning scores. It is a useful tool to measure changes in liver histology in patients with NAFLD in clinical trials.

Incidence and Prevalence in the General Population 

The incidence of NAFLD has been investigated in a limited number of studies. Two Japanese studies 9, 10 reported an incidence rate of 31 and 86 cases of suspected NAFLD per 1,000 person-years respectively, whereas another study from England showed a much lower incidence rate of 29 cases per 100,000 person-years.11 More studies are needed to better understand the incidence of NAFLD across different age, ethnic, and geographic groups.

The reported prevalence of NAFLD varies widely depending on the population studied and the definition used. The prevalence of histologically-defined NAFLD was 20% and 51% in two different studies comprised of potential living liver donors.12, 13 The reported prevalence of NAFLD when defined by liver ultrasound ranged between 17% and 46% depending on the population studied.4 In a study consisting of nearly 400 middle aged individuals, the prevalence of NAFLD defined by ultrasonography was 46% and the prevalence of histologically confirmed NASH was 12.2%.14 In the Dallas Heart Study, when assessed by MR spectroscopy the prevalence of NAFLD in the general population was 31%.15 The prevalence of suspected NAFLD when estimated using aminotransferases alone without imaging or histology ranged between 7% and 11%, but aminotransferases can be normal in individuals with NAFLD.4 In summary, estimates of the worldwide prevalence of NAFLD ranges from 6.3% to 33% with a median of 20% in the general population, based on a variety of assessment methods.4 On the other hand, the estimated prevalence of NASH is lower, ranging from 3 to 5%.4 The prevalence of NASH cirrhosis in the general population is not known.

Obesity is a common and well documented risk factor for NAFLD. Both excessive BMI and visceral obesity are recognized risk factors for NAFLD. In patients with severe obesity undergoing bariatric surgery, the prevalence of NAFLD can exceed 90% and up to 5% of patients may have unsuspected cirrhosis.4, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 There is a very high prevalence of NAFLD in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).4 An ultrasonographic study of patients with T2DM showed a 69% prevalence of NAFLD.21 In another study, 127 of 204 diabetic patients displayed fatty infiltration on ultrasound, and 87% of the patients with fatty infiltration who consented to biopsy had histologic confirmation of NAFLD.22 High serum triglyceride levels and low serum HDL levels are very common in patients with NAFLD. The prevalence of NAFLD in individuals with dyslipidemia attending lipid clinics was estimated to be 50%.23

Table 4. Risk Factors Associated with NAFLD

Conditions with established association Conditions with emerging association
Obesity Polycystic ovary syndrome
Type 2 diabetes mellitus Hypothyroidism
Dyslipidemia Obstructive Sleep apnea
Metabolic syndrome Hypopituitarism
  Hypogonadism
  Pancreato-duodenal resection

Few studies suggested that individuals with type1 diabetes have increased prevalence of hepatic steatosis based on liver imaging, but there is limited histological evidence.

The Adult Treatment Panel III clinical definition of the metabolic syndrome requires the presence of three or more of the following features: (1) waist circumference greater than 102 cm in men or greater than 88 cm in women; (2) triglyceride level 150 mg/dL or greater; (3) high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level less than 40 mg/dL in men and less than 50 mg/dL in women; (4) systolic blood pressure 130 mm Hg or greater or diastolic pressure 85 mm Hg or greater; and (5) fasting plasma glucose level 110 mg/dL or greater.198

Age, gender and ethnicity are also associated with a differential prevalence for NAFLD.4 A number of studies have shown that the prevalence of NAFLD increases with age.24, 25, 26, 27, 28 The likelihood of disease progression to advanced fibrosis or mortality increases in older patients with NAFLD.29, 30, 31 Many recent studies have reported that male gender is a risk factor for fatty liver disease.4 For example, in a study of 26,527 subjects undergoing medical checkups, the prevalence of NAFLD was 31% in men and 16% in women.32 Compared to non-Hispanic whites, Hispanic individuals have significantly higher and non-Hispanic blacks have significantly lower prevalence of NAFLD. 33, 34, 35 The prevalence of NAFLD in American-Indian and Alaskan-Native populations appears lower, ranging from 0.6% to 2.2%, although the lack of histologic definition makes it likely that is an underestimate.36, 37

There are data to suggest that hypothyroidism, hypopituitarism, hypogonadism, sleep apnea, and polycystic ovary syndrome independent of obesity are important risk factors for the presence of NAFLD (Table 4).3

The evolution of hepatic histologic changes in patients with NAFL and NASH has been investigated by several studies, but these generally included smaller number of patients and had relatively modest duration of follow-up.4, 7 Nonetheless, it is generally agreed that patients with simple steatosis have very slow, if any, histological progression, while patients with NASH can exhibit histological progression to cirrhotic-stage disease.4, 7

The long term outcomes of patients with NAFLD and NASH have been reported in several studies.31, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 Their detailed discussion is beyond the scope of this guideline, but their findings can be summarized as follows; (a) patients with NAFLD have increased overall mortality compared to matched control populations, (b) the most common cause of death in patients with NAFLD, NAFL and NASH is cardiovascular disease, and (c) patients with NASH (but not NAFL) have an increased liver-related mortality rate.

Another piece of indirect evidence that supports the progressive nature of NASH is in the features of cryptogenic cirrhosis which is closely related to NAFLD.46, 47 Patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis have disproportionately high prevalence of metabolic risk factors (T2DM, obesity, metabolic syndrome) typical of patients with NAFLD, their liver biopsies frequently show one or more features of NASH, and studies have demonstrated the loss of histological features of NASH with the development of cirrhosis.4, 7, 46, 47

Patients with NAFLD are at increased risk for HCC, but this risk is likely limited to those with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis.48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 Several studies investigated the natural history of NASH cirrhosis in comparison to patients with hepatitis C cirrhosis.54, 55, 56, 57 One large prospective US-based study55 observed a lower rate of decompensation and mortality in patients with NASH cirrhosis as compared to patients with hepatitis C cirrhosis. However, a more recent international study56 of 247 NAFLD patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis followed over a mean duration of 85.6 ± 54.5 months showed an overall 10-year survival of 81.5% that was not different from matched patients with hepatitis C cirrhosis. Importantly, both studies have shown that patients with NASH cirrhosis are at significantly lower risk for HCC than patients with hepatitis C cirrhosis.55, 56

By definition, NAFLD indicates the lack of any evidence of ongoing or recent consumption of significant quantities of alcohol. However, the precise definition of significant alcohol consumption in patients with suspected NAFLD is uncertain. A recent consensus meeting58 concluded that, for NASH clinical trials candidate eligibility purposes, significant alcohol consumption be defined as >21 drinks per week in men and >14 drinks per week in women over a 2-year period prior to baseline liver histology. Furthermore, this group recommended that validated questionnaires should be used to quantify the amount of alcohol consumption in the context of clinical trials. The definition of significant alcohol consumption in the published NAFLD literature has been inconsistent and ranged from > 1 alcoholic drink (∼ 10 grams of alcohol per one drink unit) per day to > 40 grams per day, and published studies have not always used gender-specific definitions.59 If self-reported alcohol consumption details are not consistent with clinical suspicion when evaluating a patient with suspected NAFLD, confirmation with a family member or a close friend should be considered.

Recommendation 

1.Ongoing or recent alcohol consumption > 21 drinks on average per week in men and > 14 drinks on average per week in women is a reasonable definition for significant alcohol consumption when evaluating patients with suspected NAFLD in clinical practice. (Strength – 2, Quality - C)

Some patients undergoing thoracic and abdominal imaging for reasons other than liver symptoms, signs or biochemistry may demonstrate unsuspected hepatic steatosis. While this phenomenon is not uncommon in clinical practice, studies have not systematically examined the characteristics or natural history of NAFLD in this patient population.

Recommendations 

2.When patients with unsuspected hepatic steatosis detected on imaging have symptoms or signs attributable to liver disease or have abnormal liver biochemistries, they should be evaluated as though they have suspected NAFLD and worked-up accordingly. (Strength – 1, Evidence - A)

3.In patients with unsuspected hepatic steatosis detected on imaging who lack any liver-related symptoms or signs and have normal liver biochemistries, it is reasonable to assess for metabolic risk factors (e.g., obesity, glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia) and alternate causes for hepatic steatosis such as significant alcohol consumption or medications. (Strength – 1, Evidence - A)

4.In patients with unsuspected hepatic steatosis detected on imaging who are asymptomatic and have normal liver biochemistries, a liver biopsy cannot be recommended. (Strength – 1, Evidence - B)

It can be argued that there should be systematic screening for NAFLD, at least among higher-risk individuals attending diabetes and obesity clinics. However, at present there are significant gaps in our knowledge regarding the diagnosis, natural history, and treatment of NAFLD. As liver biochemistries can be within normal ranges in patients with NAFLD and NASH, they may not be sufficiently sensitive to serve as screening tests, whereas liver ultrasound is potentially more sensitive but it is expensive and cumbersome as a screening test.

Recommendation 

5.Screening for NAFLD in adults attending primary care clinics or high-risk groups attending diabetes or obesity clinics is not advised at this time due to uncertainties surrounding diagnostic tests and treatment options, along with lack of knowledge related to the long-term benefits and cost-effectiveness of screening. (Strength – 1, Evidence - B)

Anecdotal experience and some published studies suggest familial clustering and heritability of NAFLD,60, 61, 62, 63 but conclusive studies are lacking. In a retrospective cohort study, Willner et al. observed that 18% of patients with NASH have a similarly affected first degree relative.61 A small familial aggregation study observed that patients with NAFLD have a significantly higher number of first degree relatives with cirrhosis and a trend towards familial clustering of NAFLD or cryptogenic cirrhosis than matched healthy controls.62 In another familial aggregation study63 of overweight children with and without NAFLD, after adjusting for age, gender, race, and BMI, the heritability of MR-measured liver fat fraction was 0.386, and fatty liver was present in 18% of family members of children with NAFLD despite normal ALT and lack of obesity.

Recommendation 

6.Systematic screening of family members for NAFLD is currently not recommended. (Strength – 1, Evidence - B)

The diagnosis of NAFLD requires that (a) there is hepatic steatosis by imaging or histology, (b) there is no significant alcohol consumption, (c) there are no competing etiologies for hepatic steatosis, and (d) there are no co-existing causes for chronic liver disease.

Common alternative causes of hepatic steatosis are significant alcohol consumption, hepatitis C, medications, parenteral nutrition, Wilson's disease, and severe malnutrition (Table 2). When evaluating a patient with newly suspected NAFLD, it is important to exclude co-existing etiologies for chronic liver disease including hemochromatosis, autoimmune liver disease, chronic viral hepatitis, and Wilson's disease.3 Mildly elevated serum ferritin is common in patients with NAFLD and it does not necessarily indicate increased iron stores.3, 64 Elevated serum ferritin and transferrin saturation in patients with suspected NAFLD should lead to testing for genetic hemochromatosis. Mutations in the HFE gene occur with variable frequency in patients with NAFLD and their clinical significance is unclear.64 One should consider a liver biopsy to assess hepatic iron concentration and to exclude significant hepatic injury and fibrosis in a patient with suspected NAFLD with elevated serum ferritin and a homozygote or compound heterozygote C282Y mutation in the HFE gene.65 Elevated serum autoantibodies are common in patients with NAFLD and are generally considered to be an epiphenomenon.3 In a recently published large study from the NASH Clinical Research Network, positive serum autoantibodies, defined as ANA > 1:160 or ASMA >1:40 were present in 21% of patients with well-phenotyped NAFLD and were not associated with more advanced histologic features.66

Recommendations 

7.When evaluating a patient with suspected NAFLD, it is essential to exclude competing etiologies for steatosis and co-existing common chronic liver disease. (Strength – 1, Evidence - A)

8.Persistently high serum ferritin and increased iron saturation, especially in the context of homozygote or heterozygote C282Y HFE mutations may warrant a liver biopsy. (Strength – 1, Evidence - B)

9.High serum titers of autoantibodies in association with other features suggestive of autoimmune liver disease (very high aminotransferases, high globulin) should prompt a more complete work-up for autoimmune liver disease. (Strength – 1, Evidence - B)

Non-invasive Assessment of Steatohepatitis and Advanced Fibrosis in NAFLD 

The natural history of NAFLD is fairly dichotomous – NAFL is generally benign whereas NASH can progress to cirrhosis, liver failure, and liver cancer. Existing dogma posits that liver biopsy is the most reliable approach for identifying the presence of steatohepatitis and fibrosis in patients with NAFLD, but it is generally acknowledged that biopsy is limited by cost, sampling error, and procedure-related morbidity and mortality. Serum aminotransferase levels and imaging tests such as ultrasound, CT, and MR do not reliably assess steatohepatitis and fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Therefore, there has been significant interest in developing clinical prediction rules and non-invasive biomarkers for identifying steatohepatitis in patients with NAFLD,7 but their detailed discussion is beyond the scope of this practice guideline.

The presence of metabolic syndrome is a strong predictor for the presence of steatohepatitis in patients with NAFLD3, 7, 67, 68, 69 and may be used to best identify patients with persistently abnormal liver biochemistries who would benefit diagnostically and prognostically from a liver biopsy.

There has been intense interest in non-invasive methods to identify advanced fibrosis in patients with NAFLD.7;these include the NAFLD Fibrosis Score70, Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) panel70 and transient elastography. The NAFLD Fibrosis Score is based on six readily available variables (age, BMI, hyperglycemia, platelet count, albumin, AST/ALT ratio) and it is calculated using the published formula (http://nafldscore.com). In a meta-analysis of 13 studies consisting of 3,064 patients,7 NAFLD Fibrosis Score has an AUROC of 0.85 for predicting advanced fibrosis (i.e., bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis) and a score < −1.455 had 90% sensitivity and 60% specificity to exclude advanced fibrosis whereas a score > 0.676 had 67% sensitivity and 97% specificity to identify the presence of advanced fibrosis. The ELF panel consists of plasma levels of three matrix turnover proteins (hyaluronic acid, TIMP-1, and PIIINP) had an AUROC of 0.90 with 80% sensitivity and 90% specificity for detecting advanced fibrosis.71

Circulating levels of cytokeratin-18 (CK18) fragments have been investigated extensively as novel biomarkers for the presence of steatohepatitis in patients with NAFLD.7, 72 Wieckowski et al., measured CK18 fragments in plasma that had been obtained from 44 consecutive patients with suspected NAFLD at the time of liver biopsy, and correlated the findings with hepatic immunohistochemistry data.72 Plasma CK18 fragments were markedly increased in patients with NASH compared with patients with simple steatosis or normal biopsies (median 765.7 U/L versus 202.4 U/L or 215.5 U/L, respectively; P < .001), and independently predicted NASH (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.18–3.22 for every 50 U/L increase). This observation was reproduced in several subsequent studies and a recent meta-analysis estimated that plasma CK18 levels have a sensitivity of 78%, specificity of 87%, and an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78–0.88) for steatohepatitis in patients with NAFLD.7 Although these are very encouraging results, currently this assay is not commercially available. Furthermore, as each study utilized a study-specific cut-off value, there is not an established cut-off value for identifying steatohepatitis.

Transient elastography, which measures liver stiffness non-invasively, has been successful in identifying advanced fibrosis in patients with hepatitis B and hepatitis C. Although a recent meta-analysis showed high sensitivity and specificity for identifying fibrosis in NAFLD,7 it has a high failure rate in individuals with a higher BMI. Furthermore, it is not commercially available in the United States. Other imaging tools such as MR elastography, although commercially available in the United States, is rarely used in clinical practice.

A major limitation of these prediction models and biomarkers is that they have largely been investigated in cross-sectional studies and thus their utility in monitoring disease natural history, predicting outcomes or response to therapeutic intervention is unknown.

Recommendations

10.As the metabolic syndrome predicts the presence of steatohepatitis in patients with NAFLD, its presence can be used to target patients for a liver biopsy. (Strength – 1, Evidence - B)

11.NAFLD Fibrosis Score is a clinically useful tool for identifying NAFLD patients with higher likelihood of having bridging fibrosis and/or cirrhosis. (Strength – 1, Evidence - B)

12.Although serum/plasma CK18 is a promising biomarker for identifying steatohepatitis, it is premature to recommend in routine clinical practice. (Strength – 1, Evidence - B)

When to Obtain a Liver Biopsy in Patients with NAFLD? 

Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for characterizing liver histology in patients with NAFLD. However, it is expensive and carries some morbidity and very rare mortality risk. Thus, it should be performed in those who would benefit the most from diagnostic, therapeutic guidance, and prognostic perspectives.

Recommendations 

13.Liver biopsy should be considered in patients with NAFLD who are at increased risk to have steatohepatitis and advanced fibrosis. (Strength – 1, Evidence - B)

14.The presence of metabolic syndrome and the NAFLD Fibrosis Score may be used for identifying patients who are at risk for steatohepatitis and advanced fibrosis. (Strength – 1, Evidence - B)

15.Liver biopsy should be considered in patients with suspected NAFLD in whom competing etiologies for hepatic steatosis and co-existing chronic liver diseases cannot be excluded without a liver biopsy. (Strength – 1, Evidence - B)

The management of patients with NAFLD consists of treating liver disease as well as the associated metabolic co-morbidities such as obesity, hyperlipidemia, insulin resistance and T2DM. As patients with NAFLD without steatohepatitis have excellent prognosis from a liver standpoint, treatments aimed at improving liver disease should be limited to those with NASH.

Lifestyle Intervention 

Many studies indicate that lifestyle modification may reduce aminotransferases and improve hepatic steatosis when measured either by ultrasound73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 or MR imaging and spectroscopy.81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94 In a meta-analysis of 15 early case series and clinical studies spanning between 1967 through 2000, most studies reported reductions in aminotransferases and hepatic steatosis by ultrasound across a broad spectrum of diets of different caloric restriction intensities and macronutrient composition (low vs. high carbohydrate, low vs. high fat, saturated vs. unsaturated fat diets).95 However, these early studies were inconclusive as a result of being small, largely uncontrolled and few using histology as the primary endpoint. More recent uncontrolled studies also showed an improvement in aminotransferases and hepatic steatosis on histology with lifestyle modification.96, 97, 98

Orlistat (an enteric lipase inhibitor) in conjunction with lifestyle modification was investigated in two randomized controlled trials. In the study by Ziegler-Sagi et al.,99 orlistat reportedly improved ALT and steatosis by US, but its effect on liver histology could not be evaluated because the majority of patients did not undergo a follow-up liver biopsy. However, in the study by Harrison et al.,100 orlistat did not improve body weight or liver histology.

The best evidence for weight loss as a means to improve liver histology in NASH comes from a trial that randomized 31 obese persons with NASH to intensive lifestyle changes (diet, behaviour modification and 200 minutes a week of moderate physical activity for 48 weeks) versus structured basic education alone.101 The intensive arm had 9.3% weight loss (versus 0.2% in the dietary counseling alone arm) and led to an improvement in steatosis, necrosis and inflammation, but not fibrosis. Importantly, participants with ≥ 7% weight loss had significant improvement in steatosis, lobular inflammation, ballooning, and NAFLD Activity Score (NAS).101 There was a similar pattern in the study by Harrison et al.,100 where participants who lost > 5% body weight improved steatosis, whereas individuals with ≥ 9% weight loss had significant improvement in steatosis, lobular inflammation, ballooning, and NAS.

A number of recent studies used MR spectroscopy to assess changes in hepatic fat in response to lifestyle modification. The results from these studies using a variety of interventions, either by diet alone81, 83, 84, 89, 92, 93 or in combination with different exercise prescriptions,82, 85, 86, 87, 88, 92, 94 have consistently reported a significant reduction in liver fat by an average of ∼40% (ranging from 20% to 81%). The degree of hepatic fat reduction was proportional to the intensity of the lifestyle intervention and generally required a body weight loss between ∼5 to 10%.82, 88, 92

The effect of exercise without dietary modification on hepatic steatosis was investigated in four studies using MR spectroscopy.102, 103, 104, 105 Exercise programs consisted of 2–3 sessions a week of 30–60 minutes over a period of 6 to 12 weeks. In all but one study101 liver fat content diminished without a significant change in body weight.

Recommendations 

16.Weight loss generally reduces hepatic steatosis, achieved either by hypocaloric diet alone or in conjunction with increased physical activity. (Strength – 1, Evidence - A)

17.Loss of at least 3–5% of body weight appears necessary to improve steatosis, but a greater weight loss (up to 10%) may be needed to improve necroinflammation. (Strength – 1, Evidence - B)

18.Exercise alone in adults with NAFLD may reduce hepatic steatosis but its ability to improve other aspects of liver histology remains unknown. (Strength – 1, Evidence - B)

Metformin 

Several studies investigated the effect of metformin on aminotransferases and liver histology in patients with NASH. Early small, open-label studies demonstrated a reduction in insulin resistance and aminotransferases106, 107, 108 but no significant improvement in liver histology.107, 108 An open-label trial consisting of 110 patients with NASH received either metformin 2 grams/day (55 patients), vitamin E 800 IU/day (28 patients) or dietary-induced weight loss (27 patients) for 12 months.109 Aminotransferases improved more with metformin than with vitamin E or diet alone. However, there was only a modest improvement in hepatic steatosis and inflammation in the subset of 17 patients undergoing paired liver biopsies with metformin treatment. In a 48-week open-label study in 26 patients, metformin improved NASH activity in only 30% of patients, although interpretation of the study was confounded by a significant weight loss in the responders (19% lost more than 10 kilograms).110 Haukeland et al.112 reported a similar lack of efficacy in a larger (n=48) randomized control trial (RCT) of metformin vs. placebo with a similar dietary and exercise intervention in both groups. Other studies also failed to show major benefit for metformin on hepatic insulin sensitivity, aminotransferases111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116 or liver histology.111, 113, 116 A recent meta-analysis4 concluded that 6–12 months of metformin plus lifestyle intervention did not improve aminotransferases or liver histology, compared with lifestyle intervention alone, independently of metformin dose or the presence of diabetes.

Recommendation 

19.Metformin has no significant effect on liver histology and is not recommended as a specific treatment for liver disease in adults with NASH. (Strength – 1, Evidence - A)

Several studies investigated the effect of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone on aminotransferases and liver histology in adults with NASH. In an early uncontrolled open-label study117 in 22 subjects with biopsy-proven NASH, rosiglitazone improved aminotransferases and hepatic steatosis, ballooning and inflammation scores, but not fibrosis. But in a subsequent RCT, Ratziu et al.118 observed that rosiglitazone improved aminotransferases and hepatic steatosis, but not necroinflammation or fibrosis and its two-year open-label extension phase also showed similar results.119 Belfort et al.120 conducted a RCT of pioglitazone (45 mg/day) in patients with NASH who had impaired glucose tolerance or T2DM. Although there was a significant weight gain (2.5 ± 0.5 kg) with pioglitazone, it significantly improved aminotransferases, steatosis, ballooning, and inflammation. The NAS improved with pioglitazone in 73% compared to 24% of placebo-treated patients (p<0.001) and there was a trend towards improvement in fibrosis among patients randomized to pioglitazone (p=0.08). Aithal et al.121 performed a RCT of lifestyle intervention with either pioglitazone 30 mg/day or placebo for 12 months in a total of 74 patients with NASH. While steatosis did not improve significantly compared to placebo, hepatocellular injury and fibrosis improved significantly.1210 The PIVENS122 study is a large multicenter RCT that randomized 247 non-diabetic patients with NASH to pioglitazone (30 mg/day), vitamin E (800 IU/day), or placebo for 24 months. The primary endpoint was an improvement in NAS ≥ 2 points with at least 1 point improvement in hepatocellular ballooning and 1-point improvement in either the lobular inflammation or steatosis score, and no increase in the fibrosis score.122 It was achieved in 19% in the placebo group compared to 34% in the pioglitazone group (p=0.04 vs. placebo) and 43% in the vitamin E group (p=0.001 vs. placebo).122 Because this study consisted of two primary comparisons (pioglitazone vs. placebo and vitamin E vs. placebo), a p-value of 0.025 was considered to be significant a priori. Therefore, although there were histological benefits associated with pioglitazone, this study concluded that pioglitazone did not meet the primary end point. However, resolution of NASH, a key secondary end point, was achieved in significantly higher number of patients receiving pioglitazone than receiving placebo (47% vs. 21%, p=0.001).122 Of note, pioglitazone was associated with a 4.7 kg weight gain compared to placebo (p<0.001). Vitamin E and pioglitazone were well tolerated and there were no differences in other adverse events.

A recent meta-analysis4 that included 5 RCTs showed that pioglitazone significantly improved steatosis (OR 4.05, 95% CI 2.58–6.35) and inflammation (OR 3.53, 95% CI 2.21–5.64), but not fibrosis (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.87–2.24).

There has been considerable debate about the long-term safety of TZDs regarding cardiovascular disease, congestive heart failure (CHF), bladder cancer, and bone loss. In a recent meta-analysis123 of 19 trials enrolling a total of 16,390 patients with T2DM, pioglitazone treatment was associated with a significant reduction (∼18%) in the primary outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (p=0.005). However, there was also a higher rate of CHF with pioglitazone (2.3% vs. 1.8% in the control group, p=0.002), so caution must be exercised when considering its use in patients with impaired myocardial function. Due to increased risk of coronary events, rosiglitazone is no longer marketed in Europe and its use is highly restricted in the United States.

Recommendation 

20.Pioglitazone can be used to treat steatohepatitis in patients with biopsy-proven NASH. However, it should be noted that majority of the patients who participated in clinical trials that investigated pioglitazone for NASH were non-diabetic and that long term safety and efficacy of pioglitazone in patients with NASH is not established. (Strength – 1, Evidence - B)

Oxidative stress is considered to be a key mechanism of hepatocellular injury and disease progression in subjects with NASH. Vitamin E is an anti-oxidant and has been investigated to treat NASH.124, 125, 126, 127, 128 Comparison between these trials is difficult due to varying criteria for entry into the study, different doses of vitamin E and unclear formulations of vitamin E used which could affect its bioavailability, the additional use of other anti-oxidants or other drugs and limited histologic data to assess outcomes. Also, most studies were relatively under-powered and did not meet or publish CONSORT criteria for clinical trials. Despite these limitations, it can be summarized that (1) the use of vitamin E is associated with a decrease in aminotransferases in subjects with NASH, (2) studies where histologic endpoints were evaluated indicate that vitamin E causes improvement in steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning and resolution of steatohepatitis in adults with NASH, and (3) vitamin E has no effect on hepatic fibrosis. Although two meta-analyses8, 129 failed to observe significant histological benefits with vitamin E in patients with NASH, these analyses were conducted before PIVENS122 and TONIC130 trials were published. In the largest clinical trial (PIVENS)122 reported to date, the pure form of rrr α-tocopherol was orally administered at a dose of 800 IU/day for 96 weeks. The primary endpoint as stated previously was achieved in a significantly greater number of participants receiving vitamin E compared to placebo (42% vs. 19%, p< 0.001, number needed to treat= 4.4).

One concern with vitamin E is the controversial issue of whether it increases all-cause mortality. Some meta-analyses have reported an increase in all-cause mortality with high dose vitamin E,131, 132 but others failed to confirm such an association.133, 134, 135 A recently published RCT showed that vitamin E administered at a dose of 400 IU/day increased the risk of prostate cancer in relatively healthy men (absolute increase of 1.6 per 1000 person years of vitamin E use).136

Recommendation

21.Vitamin E (α-tocopherol) administered at daily dose of 800 IU/day improves liver histology in non-diabetic adults with biopsy-proven NASH and therefore it should be considered as a first-line pharmacotherapy for this patient population. (Strength – 1, Quality – B)

22.Until further data supporting its effectiveness become available, vitamin E is not recommended to treat NASH in diabetic patients, NAFLD without liver biopsy, NASH cirrhosis, or cryptogenic cirrhosis. (Strength – 1, Quality – C)

Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA), Omega-3 Fatty Acids, and Miscellaneous Agents 

Several studies126, 137, 138, 139, 140 investigated UDCA (conventional and high doses) to improve aminotransferases and steatosis in patients with NAFLD and liver histology in patients with NASH. All but one study139 have been proof-of-concept studies with small number of participants and/or surrogate endpoints. Notably, a single large multicenter RCT convincingly showed that UDCA offers no histological benefit over placebo in patients with NASH.139 Omega-3 fatty acids, currently approved in the United States to treat hypertriglyceridemia, have been investigated to treat NAFLD both in animal models and in humans.141 A recent review by Masterton et al,142 of published literature related to omega-3 fatty acids in NAFLD, found experimental evidence to support their use but the interpretation of human studies was limited by small sample size and methodological flaws. A large multicenter study of one omega-3 fatty acid (eicosapentanoic acid) to treat NASH is ongoing in the United States. More than a dozen other miscellaneous agents have been investigated in small, proof-of-concept studies and their detailed evaluation is beyond the scope of this guideline.

Recommendations 

23.UDCA is not recommended for the treatment of NAFLD or NASH. (Strength – 1, Quality – B)

24.It is premature to recommend omega-3 fatty acids for the specific treatment of NAFLD or NASH but they may be considered as the first line agents to treat hypertriglyceridemia in patients with NAFLD. (Strength – 1, Quality – B)

As the majority of patients undergoing bariatric surgery have associated fatty liver disease, there has been an interest in foregut bariatric surgery as a potential treatment option for NASH. There are no RCTs that evaluated any type of foregut bariatric surgical procedure to specifically treat NAFLD or NASH. However, there are several retrospective and prospective cohort studies that compared liver histology in the severely obese individuals before and after bariatric surgery. Unfortunately, in the majority of these studies, post-bypass liver biopsies were performed at varying intervals and only in selected patients undergoing surgical procedures such as hernia repair or adhesiolysis. One exception is the study by Mathurin et al.,143 that prospectively correlated clinical and metabolic data with liver histology before and 1 and 5 years after bariatric surgery in 381 adult patients with severe obesity. Gastric band, bilio-intestinal bypass, and gastric bypass were done in 56%, 23%, and 21%, respectively. Compared to baseline, there was a significant improvement in the prevalence and severity of steatosis and ballooning at 1 and 5 years following bariatric surgery. In patients with probable or definite NASH at baseline (n=99), there was a significant improvement in steatosis, ballooning, and NAS and resolution of probable or definite NASH at 1 and 5 years following bariatric surgery. Most histological benefits were evident at 1 year with no differences in liver histology between 1 and 5 years following bariatric surgery. Intriguingly, a minor but statistically significant increase in mean fibrosis score was noted at 5 years after the bariatric surgery (from 0.27± 0.55 at baseline to 0.36 ± 0.59, p=0.001). Despite this increase, at 5 years 96% of patients exhibited fibrosis score ≤ F1 and 0.5% had F3, indicating there is no clinically significant worsening in fibrosis that can be attributed directly to the procedure. In the important subgroup of patients with probable or definite NASH at baseline, there was no worsening of fibrosis at 1 and 5 years, compared to baseline liver biopsy. As no patient in the study had F3 or F4 at baseline, the effect of bariatric surgery in those with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis could not be evaluated.

Two meta-analyses144, 145 evaluated the effect of bariatric surgery on the liver histology in patients with NAFLD. The meta-analysis by Mummadi et al.,144 showed that steatosis, steatohepatitis, and fibrosis appear to improve or completely resolve after bariatric surgery. However, a recently published Cochrane review145 concluded that lack of randomized clinical trials or quasi-randomized clinical studies prevents definitive assessment of benefits and harms of bariatric surgery as a therapeutic approach for patients with NASH.

Recommendations 

25.Foregut bariatric surgery is not contraindicated in otherwise eligible obese individuals with NAFLD or NASH (but without established cirrhosis). (Strength – 1, Quality – A)

26.The type, safety and efficacy of foregut bariatric surgery in otherwise eligible obese individuals with established cirrhosis due to NAFLD are not established. (Strength – 1, Quality – B)

27.It is premature to consider foregut bariatric surgery as an established option to specifically treat NASH. (1B)

Alcohol Use in Patients with NAFLD and NASH 

Heavy alcohol consumption is a risk factor for chronic liver disease and should be avoided by patients with NAFLD and NASH. The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) defines heavy or at-risk drinking as more than 4 drinks on any day or more than 14 drinks per week in men or more than 3 drinks on any day or 7 drinks per week in women.146 Several recent cross-sectional studies147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153 suggest a beneficial effect of light alcohol consumption (on average less than one drink per day) on the presence (defined either biochemically or by imaging) and severity of NAFLD. There are no studies reporting the effect of ongoing alcohol consumption on disease severity or natural history of NAFLD or NASH. The effects of light drinking on the cardiovascular system and cancer risks, if any, have not been investigated in individuals with NAFLD.

Recommendations 

28.Patients with NAFLD should not consume heavy amounts of alcohol. (Strength −1, Quality – B)

29.No recommendation can be made with regards to non-heavy consumption of alcohol by individuals with NAFLD. (Strength – 1, Quality – B)

Statin Use in Patients with NAFLD and NASH 

Patients with NAFLD and NASH are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease and several studies have established cardiovascular disease as their most common cause of death.6 Patients with NAFLD should be risk stratified for cardiovascular disease, and their cardiovascular risk factors should be managed accordingly.154 The treatment of dyslipidemia should be considered in the overall frame work of cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with NAFLD.154

Statins are an important class of agents to treat dyslipidemia, and yet there is continued reluctance to use statins in patients with suspected or established chronic liver disease, including NAFLD and NASH. Although elevated aminotransferases are not uncommon in patients receiving statins, serious liver injury from statins is rarely seen in clinical practice. Over the last decade, one RCT and several retrospective and prospective studies155, 156, 157, 158, 159 have established that (a) statins are safe in patients with liver disease and (b) there is no evidence that patients with chronic liver disease including at NAFLD and NASH are at higher risk for serious liver injury from statins than those without liver disease.

Several studies have suggested that statins may improve liver biochemistries and histology in patients with NASH.159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167 These studies consisted of small number of patients and have not been rigorously designed. A recent post-hoc analysis of the cardiovascular outcomes study, GREACE,165 observed that statins significantly improve liver biochemistries and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with elevated liver enzymes likely due to NAFLD. There are no RCTs with histological endpoints which investigated statins to treat NASH.

Recommendations 

30.Given the lack of evidence to show that patients with NAFLD and NASH are at increased risk for serious drug-induced liver injury from statins, statins can be used to treat dyslipidemia in patients with NAFLD and NASH. (Strength – 1, Quality – B)

31.Until RCTs with histological endpoints prove their efficacy, statins should not be used to specifically treat NASH. (Strength – 1, Quality – B)

Because of the high prevalence of risk factors for NAFLD and NASH, it is not uncommon for patients with other chronic liver diseases to exhibit co-existing histological features of NAFLD.168 Coexistent hepatic steatosis is common in chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection and is strongly associated with more advanced liver disease.169, 170, 171 Another large study showed high prevalence of steatosis (40.5%) and steatohepatitis (15%) in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC),172 although at least some of the steatosis and steatohepatitis in that study was suspected to be due to alcohol consumption. In clinical practice, it is not uncommon for obese and/or diabetic patients with autoimmune liver disease to exhibit steatosis and steatohepatitis in their liver biopsies.

Previous studies have shown that obesity, insulin resistance, and hepatic steatosis are associated with a lower response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin for the treatment of HCV.173, 174, 175 Obesity does not have a similar negative impact on the response to newer protease-inhibitor based anti-viral regimens,176, 177, 178, 179, 180 but the impact of insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis has not yet been investigated sufficiently. It is not known if the treatment of steatosis and steatohepatitis alters the natural history of other chronic liver diseases such as HCV and PBC. Furthermore, it is not known if agents such as vitamin E and pioglitazone are effective to treat steatosis and steatohepatitis when present in patients with other chronic liver diseases.

Recommendations 

32.When steatosis and steatohepatitis are evident in patients with other types of chronic liver disease, it is important to assess for metabolic risk factors and alternate etiologies for hepatic steatosis. (Strength – 1, Quality – B)

33.In patients with other types of chronic liver diseases who have co-existing NAFLD and NASH, there are no data to support the use of vitamin E or pioglitazone to improve the liver disease. (Strength – 1, Quality – B)

34.Patients with NASH cirrhosis should be screened for gastroesophageal varices according to the AASLD/ACG practice guidelines.181(Strength – 1, Quality – B)

35.Patients with NASH cirrhosis should be considered for HCC screening according to the AASLD/ACG practice guidelines.182(Strength – 1, Quality – B)

36.Current evidence does not support routinely repeating a liver biopsy in patients with NAFL or NASH. (Strength – 2, Quality – C)

Aspects of NAFLD Specific to Children and Adolescents 

Recognition of NAFLD in children is essential to understanding the origin of disease in those likely to be most genetically or environmentally susceptible. Adults with onset of NAFLD in childhood may be most at risk for early or severe complications. Definition of NAFLD in childhood is the same as in adults. Children are reported with NAFLD as early as 2 years and with NASH-related cirrhosis as early as age 8.183, 184

Prevalence and Risk Factors 

Estimation of population prevalence in children presents difficulties for the same reasons detailed above in adults. Estimates vary based upon the type of test or imaging, the cut-points for detection, and the age, sex, race and ethnicity of the geographic region sampled. A school-based study of obese children in Minnesota, California, Texas and Louisiana, using abnormal serum ALT as a surrogate marker (>40U/L), found that 23% of 17–18 year olds had elevated unexplained ALT.183 An autopsy study using the “gold standard” of liver histology examined 742 children between the ages of 2–19 y who died from unnatural causes. The estimated NAFLD prevalence was 9.6% when adjusted for age, gender, race and ethnicity.184 Multivariate analyses showed that obesity, older age (in adolescence), male gender, and Hispanic ethnicity are independent predictors of fatty liver prevalence.

A single retrospective single center report has been published on the natural history of NAFLD in 66 children.185 Only 5 had serial biopsies, obtained for unspecified reasons over varying intervals, averaging 41 months between biopsies. Of these 5 children, 4 had progression of fibrosis. Four of the 5 underwent liver transplantation and 2 died of cirrhosis. Clearly, more robust prospective data are needed on larger number of children to better understand the natural history of NAFLD in children.

Screening for NAFLD in Children 

NAFLD is under-diagnosed in children due to lack of recognition, screening or appreciation of associated complications by health care providers. One study showed that less than a third of obese children were screened for NAFLD at clinic visits.186 Children may not be recognized as obese at visits and age-appropriate norms for body mass index may go unacknowledged. Abdominal adiposity may mask detection of hepatomegaly by palpation during physician examination. As in adults, children with features of metabolic syndrome such as obesity, hypertension, insulin resistance and dyslipidemia are at higher risk for NAFLD and particular histopathological features of NAFLD correlate with components of metabolic syndrome.187 Thus, identification of children at risk for NAFLD could occur in general health provider settings as well as in specialty clinics for nutrition, gastroenterology, hepatology, endocrinology and bariatric surgery. Children may also exhibit NAFLD incidentally discovered while undergoing imaging, but there are no studies evaluating how to proceed with children identified in this fashion. Recently, the summary report of an expert committee suggested biannual screening for liver disease with serum ALT and AST starting at age 10 years in obese children and those with BMI of 85th to 94th percentile with other risk factors.188

Penetrance of NAFLD has been demonstrated in family members of children with NAFLD.63 The likelihood of first, second and third degree relatives exhibiting abnormally high fat fractions (by MRI estimation) relative to body mass index is much more highly correlated in those related to a child with NAFLD than to those who are related to an age, gender and BMI-matched child without NAFLD.

Diagnosis in Children 

Given the relatively early onset, caregivers must give additional consideration to the possibility of monogenic disorders that present as fatty liver disease in very young children. Considerations include inborn errors of fatty acid or carnitine metabolism, peroxisomal disorders, lysosomal storage disorders, Wilson's disease, and cystic fibrosis.189 However, as in adults, positive serum autoantibodies are present in a significant population of children with biopsy-proven NAFLD and on some occasion liver biopsy is required to discriminate between autoimmune hepatitis and NAFLD.187 Obviously, the confounding factor of alcoholism is much less common in children and standard questionnaires for quantifying alcohol intake are usually unnecessary.

Recommendations 

37.Children with fatty liver who are very young or not overweight should be tested for monogenic causes of chronic liver disease such as fatty acid oxidation defects, lysosomal storage diseases and peroxisomal disorders, in addition to those causes considered for adults. (Strength – 2, Quality – C)

38.Low serum titers of autoantibodies are often present in children with NAFLD, but higher titers, particularly in association with higher serum aminotransferases and high globulin should prompt a liver biopsy to evaluate for possible autoimmune hepatitis. (Strength – 2, Quality – B)

39.Due to a paucity of evidence, a formal recommendation cannot be made with regards to screening for NAFLD in overweight and obese children despite a recent expert committee recommendation for biannual screening for liver disease with liver enzyme measurements in this population. (Strength –1, Quality – B).

The decision to perform a liver biopsy in a child to confirm the diagnosis of NAFLD must be weighed against the risks associated with biopsy and the likelihood that the result will impact management. In children with an uncertain diagnosis, biopsy may rule out potential drug hepatotoxicity or lack of clarity due to presence of serum autoantibodies. When there is an interest in grading or staging NAFLD, instead of submitting all children with NAFLD to a liver biopsy it would be optimal to identify those children who are more likely to have NASH. The paucity of natural history data confounds the decision to biopsy since alteration of long-term outcomes with treatment based on severity of histology at baseline is unknown.

As in adults, development of noninvasive biomarkers or imaging to identify those at risk for more rapid progression or severe disease onset is desirable. Particularly, accurate markers of cellular injury and fibrosis are needed. Two studies suggested that ELF score can be used to accurately predict fibrosis in children with NAFLD, but both studies consisted of relatively small number of children and fewer with advanced fibrosis.190, 191 There is reported benefit in predicting fibrosis stage in pediatric patients, with a AUROC of 0.92, although only 9 of the 76 subjects studied had fibrosis stage 3 or more.190 Validation of the serum CK18 levels to evaluate NASH needs to be undertaken in children with NAFLD.

Recommendations

40.Liver biopsy in children with suspected NAFLD should be performed in those where the diagnosis is unclear, where there is possibility of multiple diagnoses, or before starting therapy with potentially hepatotoxic medications. (Strength – 1, Quality – B)

41.A liver biopsy to establish a diagnosis of NASH should be obtained prior to starting children on pharmacologic therapy for NASH. (Strength – 2, Quality – C).

Histopathology of children with NAFLD can differ from that found in adults.192 As in adults, children can present with pronounced features of hepatocellular injury, lobular inflammation, and peri-sinusoidal fibrosis, but there is a unique pattern of unclear significance also recognized in children. This pattern is typified by marked macrovesicular hepatocellular steatosis, portal inflammation and portal fibrosis in the absence of ballooning.192, 193, 194

Recommendation 


42.Pathologists interpreting pediatric NAFLD biopsies should recognize the unique pattern frequently found in children to not misidentify pediatric NAFLD. (Strength – 1, Quality – B)

Recommendations for pediatric treatment options are limited by a small number of randomized clinical trials and insufficient information on natural history to assess risk-benefit. The overall goal is to improve a child's quality of life and reduce longer term cardiovascular and liver morbidity and mortality. Given that early-onset likely indicates higher likelihood of later complications, attempts should be made to identify children who will benefit from intervention.

Since most pediatric NAFLD patients are obese, addressing their obesity is the first step. An open label study195 in 84 Italian children with biopsy-proven NAFLD showed that >20% body weight reduction over 12 months resulted in improvement in serum ALT and steatosis by ultrasonography in most children with NAFLD. Reportedly, 94% of the 70 enrolled subjects were able to achieve this weight loss goal using caloric restriction and exercise advice. Since liver biopsies were not performed at the end of the study, the effect of lifestyle intervention on liver histology could not be determined. In another study, Nobili et al.196 randomized 53 children with biopsy-proven NAFLD to lifestyle modification plus antioxidant therapy or lifestyle modification and placebo. Antioxidant therapy did not improve liver histology, but children in both groups showed significant improvement in steatosis, inflammation, ballooning, and the NAS. Although there are no randomized controlled trials of intensive lifestyle modification compared to standard-of-care advice, these two studies indicate that lifestyle modification is beneficial in children with NAFLD.

No information exists on recommending any particular type of diet or exercise. Further studies are needed to assess the efficacy of specific diets. Recommendations for overweight pediatric NAFLD patients should include consultation with a registered dietitian to assess quality of diet and measurement of caloric intake, adoption of American Heart Association dietary strategies, and regular aerobic exercise progressing in difficulty as fitness allows.197, 198 Enlisting other willing family members to adopt diet and exercise goals may aid compliance.

As in adults, clinical trials for pediatric NAFLD generally targeted insulin resistance or oxidative stress. Open-label proof-of-concept studies have utilized changes in serum ALT or liver brightness on ultrasound as endpoints.189 Agents evaluated thus far include metformin, vitamin E, ursodeoxycholic acid and delayed-release cysteamine.189 Recently, a large multicenter RCT using change in histology as a secondary endpoint was published.130 This study, called TONIC, compared the efficacy of vitamin E or metformin to placebo in 8–17 year olds with NAFLD.130 Although the primary outcome of sustained reduction of ALT was not different among the 3 groups, there were statistically significant improvements in NAS and resolution of NASH (p<0.006) with vitamin E treatment compared to placebo over 96 weeks.130 In this study, metformin administered at 500 mg twice daily dose had no effect on liver biochemistries or liver histology.

Recommendations 

43.Intensive lifestyle modification improves aminotransferases and liver histology in children with NAFLD and thus should be the first line of treatment. (Strength – 2, Quality – B)

44.Metformin at 500 mg twice daily offers no benefit to children with NAFLD and thus should not be prescribed. The effect of metformin administered at a higher dose is not known. (Strength – 1, Quality – B)

45.Vitamin E 800 IU/day (RRR α–tocopherol) offers histological benefits to children with biopsy-proven NASH or borderline NASH but confirmatory studies are needed before it's use can be recommended in clinical practice. (Strength – 1, Quality – B)

Acknowledgments 

This practice guideline was developed in collaboration with the AASLD Practice Guidelines Committee, and was approved by the ACG Practice Parameters Committee, and the AGA Institute Clinical Practice and Quality Management Committee. Raphael B. Merriman, MD, MRCPI and Benjamin L. Shneider, MD served as primary reviewers for the AASLD Practice Guidelines Committee. Dr. Merriman declared no relevant conflicts of interest. Dr. Shneider serves as a scientific consultant with Bristol-Myers Squibb and the advisory board for Ikaria. External review was provided by Jean P. Molleston, MD and Stephen A. Harrison, MD. Dr. Molleston received research support from Schering-Plough and Roche. Dr. Harrison serves as a consultant to Amylin Pharmaceuticals and has received research support from Rottapharm and Mochida.

References:

1. Eddy DM. A manual for assessing health practices and designing practice guidelines. Philadelphia. American College of Physi- cians. 1996;1–126.
2. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso- Coello P, Schunemann HJ. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ
2008;336:924 –926.
3. Vuppalanchi R, Chalasani N. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: selected practical issues in their management. Hepatology 2009;49:306 –317.
4. Vernon G, Baranova A, Younossi ZM. Systematic review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver dis- ease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults. Aliment Phar- macol Ther 2011;34:274 –285.
5. Neuschwander-Tetri BA. Hepatic lipotoxicity and the pathogene- sis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: the central role of nontriglyc- eride fatty acid metabolites. Hepatology 2010;52:774 –788.
6. Targher G, Day CP, Bonora E. Risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med
2010;363:1341–1350.
7. G, Gambino R, Cassader M, Pagano G. Meta-analysis: Natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for liver disease severity. Annals of Medicine 2011;43(8):617– 49.
8. Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M, Pagano G. A meta-analysis of randomized trials for the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2010;52:79 –104.
9. Suzuki A, Angulo P, Lymp J, St Sauver J, Muto A, Okada T, Lindor K. Chronological development of elevated aminotransferases in a nonalcoholic population. Hepatology. 2005;41(1):64 –71.
10. Hamaguchi M, Kojima T, Takeda N, et al. The metabolic syn- drome as a predictor of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Ann Intern Med 2005;143(10):722– 8.
11. Whalley S, Puvanachandra P, Desai A, Kennedy H. Hepatology outpatient service provision in secondary care: a study of liver disease incidence and resource costs. Clin Med. 2007;7(2):
119 –24.
12. Lee JY, Kim KM, Lee SG, Yu E, Lim YS, Lee HC, Chung YH, Lee YS, Suh DJ. Prevalence and risk factors of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in potential living liver donors in Korea: a review of
589 consecutive liver biopsies in a single center. J Hepatol.
2007;47(2):239 – 44.
13. Marcos A, Fischer RA, Ham JM, Olzinski AT, Shiffman ML, Sanyal AJ, Luketic VA, Sterling RK, Olbrisch ME, Posner MP. Transplan- tation 2000; 69: 2410 –2415.
14. Williams CD, Stenger J, Asike MI, Torres DM, Shaw J, Contreras M, Landt CL, Harrison SA. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among a largely mid- dle-aged population utilizing ultrasound and liver biopsy: a pro- spective study. Gastroenterology 2011;140:124 –131.
15. Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, Nuremberg P, Horton JD, Cohen JC, Grundy SM, Hobbs HH. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity. Hepatology. 2004;40:1387–95.
16. Boza C, Riquelme A, Ibañez L, Duarte I, Norero E, Viviani P, Soza A,Fernandez JI, Raddatz A, Guzman S, Arrese M. Predictors of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in obese patients undergo- ing gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1148 –53.
17. Haentjens P, Massaad D, Reynaert H, Peeters E, Van Meerhae- ghe A, Vinken S, Poppe K, Velkeniers B. Identifying non-alcoholic fatty liver disease among asymptomatic overweight and obese individuals by clinical and biochemical characteristics. Acta Clin Belg. 2009;64:483–93.
18. Machado M, Marques-Vidal P, Cortez-Pinto H. Hepatic histology
in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. J Hepatol. 2006;
45:600 – 6.
19. Colicchio P, Tarantino G, del Genio F, Sorrentino P, Saldalamac- chia G,Finelli C, Conca P, Contaldo F, Pasanisi F. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in young adult severely obese non-diabetic patients in South Italy. Ann Nutr Metab. 2005;49:289 –95.
20. Beymer C, Kowdley KV, Larson A, Edmonson P, Dellinger EP, Flum DR. Prevalence and predictors of asymptomatic liver dis- ease in patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery. Arch Surg.
2003;138:1240 – 4.
21. Leite NC, Salles GF, Araujo AL, Villela-Nogueira CA, Cardoso CR.
Prevalence and associated factors of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. Liver Int. 2009;
29:113–9.
22. Prashanth M, Ganesh HK, Vima MV, John M, Bandgar T, Joshi SR, Shah SR, Rathi PM, Joshi AS, Thakkar H, Menon PS, Shah NS. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Assoc Physicians India. 2009;57:
205–10.
23. Assy N, Kaita K, Mymin D, Levy C, Rosser B, Minuk G. Fatty infiltration of liver in hyperlipidemic patients. Dig Dis Sci 2000;
45:1929 –1934.
24. Li H, Wang YJ, Tan K, Zeng L, Liu L, Liu FJ, Zhou TY, Chen EQ, Tang H. Prevalence and risk factors of fatty liver disease in Chengdu, Southwest China. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int.
2009;8(4):377– 82.
25. Amarapurkar D, Kamani P, Patel N, Gupte P, Kumar P, Agal S, Baijal R, Lala S, Chaudhary D, Deshpande A. Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: population based study. Ann Hepatol. 2007;6(3):161–3.
26. Park SH, Jeon WK, Kim SH, Kim HJ, Park DI, Cho YK, Sung IK, Sohn CI, Keum DK, Kim BI. Prevalence and risk factors of non- alcoholic fatty liver disease among Korean adults. J Gastroen- terol Hepatol. 2006;21(1 Pt 1):138 – 43.
27. Frith J, Day CP, Henderson E, Burt AD, Newton JL. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in older people. Gerontology. 2009;55(6):
607–13.
28. Chen CH, Huang MH, Yang JC, Nien CK, Yang CC, Yeh YH, Yueh SK. Prevalence and etiology of elevated serum alanine amino- transferase level in an adult population in Taiwan. J Gastroen- terol Hepatol. 2007;22:1482–9.1604 AGA GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 142, No. 7
























































 

 

 

67. Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, Forlani G, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver, steatohepatitis, and the metabolic syndrome. Hepatology
2003;37:917–923.
68. Kang H, Greenson JK, Omo JT et al. Metabolic syndrome is associated with greater histologic severity, higher carbohydrate, and lower fat diet in patients with NAFLD. Am J Gastroenterol
2006;101:2247–2253.
69. Ryan MC, Wilson AM, Slavin J et al. Associations between liver histology and severity of the metabolic syndrome in subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Diabetes Care 2005;28:1222–
1224.
70. Wieckowska A, Zein NN, Yerian LM, Lopez AR, McCullough AJ, Feldstein AE. In vivo assessment of liver cell apoptosis as a novel biomarker of disease severity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2006;44:27–33.
71. Angulo P, Hui JM, Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, George J, Farrell GC, Enders F, Saksena S, Burt DA, et al. The NAFLD fibrosis score: a noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in pa- tients with NAFLD. Hepatology 2007;45:846 – 854.
72. Wieckowska A, McCullough AJ, Feldstein AE. Noninvasive diag- nosis and monitoring of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: present and future. Hepatology 2007;46:582–589.
73. Andersen T, Gluud C, Franzmann MB, Christoffersen P. Hepatic effects of dietary weight loss in morbidly obese subjects. J Hepa- tol. 1991;12:224 –9.
74. Palmer M, Schaffner F. Effect of weight reduction on hepatic abnormalities in overweight patients. Gastroenterology. 1990;
99:1408 –13.
75. Park HS, Kim MW, Shin ES. Effect of weight control on hepatic abnormalities in obese patients with fatty liver. J Korean Med Sci. 1995;10:414 –21.
76. Ueno T, Sugawara H, Sujaku K, Hashimoto O, Tsuji R, Tamaki S, et al. Therapeutic effects of restricted diet and exercise in obese patients with fatty liver. J Hepatol. 1997;27:103–7.
77. Kugelmas M, Hill DB, Vivian B, Marsano L, McClain CJ. Cytokines and NASH: a pilot study of the effects of lifestyle modification and vitamin E. Hepatology. 2003;38:413–9.
78. Sreenivasa Baba CS, Alexander G, Kalyani B, Pandey R, Rastogi S, Pandey A, et al. Effect of exercise and dietary modification on serum aminotransferase levels in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:191– 8.
79. Hickman IJ, Jonsson JR, Prins JB, Ash S, Purdie DM, Clouston AD, Powell EE. Modest weight loss and physical activity in over- weight patients with chronic liver disease results in sustained improvements in alanine aminotransferase, fasting insulin, and quality of life. Gut. 2004;53:413– 419.
80. Suzuki A, Lindor K, Saver J, Lymp J, Mendes F, Muto A, Okada T, et al. Effect of changes on body weight and lifestyle in nonalco- holic fatty liver disease. J Hepatology 2005;43:1060 –1066.
81. Tiikkainen M, Bergholm R, Vehkavaara S, Rissanen A, Hakkinen AM, Tamminen M, Teramo K, Yki-Jarvinen H. Effects of identical weight loss on body composition and features of insulin resis- tance in obese women with high and low liver fat content. Dia- betes 2003;52:701–707.
82. Tamura Y, Tanaka Y, Sato F, Choi JB, Watada H, Niwa M, et al.
Effects of diet and exercise on muscle and liver intracellular lipid contents and insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:3191– 6.
83. Westerbacka J, Lammi K, Hakkinen AM, Rissanen A, Salminen I, Aro A, et al. Dietary fat content modifies liver fat in over- weight nondiabetic subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;
90:2804 –9.
84. Petersen KF, Dufour S, Befroy D, Lehrke M, Hendler RE, Shulman GI. Reversal of nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis, hepatic insulin resistance, and hyperglycemia by moderate weight reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2005;54:603– 8.
85. Larson-Meyer DE, Heilbronn LK, Redman LM, Newcomer BR, Frisard MI, Anton S, Smith SR, Alfonso A, Ravussin E. Effect of calorie restriction with or without exercise on insulin sensitivity,

-cell function, fat cell size, and ectopic lipid in overweight subjects. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1337–1344.

 

86. Thomas EL, Brynes AE, Hamilton G, Patel N, Spong A, Goldin RD, Frost G, Bell JD, Taylor-Robinson SD. Effect of nutritional coun- selling on hepatic, muscle and adipose tissue fat content and distribution in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastro- enterol 2006;12:5813–5819.
87. Thamer C, Machann J, Stefan N, Haap M, Schafer S, Brenner S, Kantartzis K, Claussen C, Schick F, Haring H, Fritsche A. High visceral fat mass and high liver fat are associated with resis- tance to lifestyle intervention. Obesity 2007;15:531–538.
88. Schafer S, Kantartzis K, Machann J, Venter C, Niess A, Schick F, et al. Lifestyle intervention in individuals with normal versus impaired glucose tolerance. Eur J Clin Invest 2007;37:535–543.
89. Cowin GJ, Jonsson JR, Bauer JD, Ash S, Ali A, Osland EJ, Purdie DM, Clouston AD, Powell EE, Galloway GJ. Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for monitoring liver steatosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:937–945.
90. Larson-Meyer DE, Newcomer BR, Heilbronn LK, Volaufova J, Smith SR, Alfonso AJ, Lefevre M, Rood JC, Williamson DA, Ra- vussin E. Effect of 6-month calorie restriction and exercise on serum and liver lipids and markers of liver function. Obesity
2008;16:1355–1362.
91. Viljanen AP, Iozzo P, Borra R, Kankaanpa M, Karmi A, Lautamaki R, Jarvisalo M, Parkkola R, Ronnemaa T, Guiducci L, Lehtimaki T, Raitakari OT, Mari A, Nuutila P. Effect of weight loss on liver free fatty acid uptake and hepatic insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:50 –55.
92. Kantartzis 2009 Kantartzis K, Thamer C, Peter A, Machann J, Schick F, Schraml C, et al. High cardiorespiratory fitness is an independent predictor of the reduction in liver fat during a life- style intervention in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut 2009;
58:1281–1288.
93. Kirk E, Reeds DN, Finck BN, Mayurranjan SM, Patterson BW, Klein S. Dietary fat and carbohydrates differentially alter insulin sensitivity during caloric restriction. Gastroenterology 2009;136:
1552–1560.
94. Lazo M, Solga SF, Horska A, Bonekamp S, Diehl AM, Brancati FL, Wagenknecht LE, Pi-Sunyer FX, Kahn S, Clark JM, for the Fatty Liver Subgroup of the Look Ahead Research Group. Effect of a
12-month intensive lifestyle intervention on hepatic steatosis in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010;33:2156 –
2163.
95. Wang R, Koretz R, Yee H. Is weight reduction an effective therapy for nonalcoholic fatty liver? A systematic review. Am J Med.
2003;115:554 –9.
96. Hickman IJ, Clouston AD, Macdonald GA, Purdie DM, Prins JB, Ash S, et al. Effect of weight reduction on liver histology and biochemistry in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Gut 2002;51:
89 –94.
97. Huang MA, Greenson JK, Chao C, Anderson L, Peterman D, Jacobson J, et al. One-year intense nutritional counseling results in histological improvement in patients with non-alco- holic steatohepatitis: a pilot study. Amer J Gastroenterol.

2005;100:1072– 81.
98. Tendler D, Lin S, Yancy WS, Jr., Mavropoulos J, Sylvestre P, Rockey DC, et al. The effect of a low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a pilot study. Digestive Dis- eases & Sciences. 2007;52:589 –93.
99. Zelber-Sagi S, Kessler A, Brazowsky E, Webb M, Lurie Y, Santo M, et al. A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial of orlistat for the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:639 – 44.
100. Harrison SA, Brunt EM, Fecht WJ, Neuschwander-Tetri BA. Orl- istat for overweight subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): a randomized prospective trial. Hepatology 2009;49:
80 – 86.
101. Promrat K, Kleiner DE, Niemeier HM, Jackvony E, Kearns M, Wands JR, et al. Randomized controlled trial testing the effects

 

of weight loss on nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology
2010;51:121–129.
102. Shojaee-Moradie F, Baynes KC, Pentecost C, Bell JD, Thomas EL, Jackson NC, et al. Exercise training reduces fatty acid avail- ability and improves the insulin sensitivity of glucose metabo- lism. Diabetologia 2007;50:404 – 413.
103. Bonekamp S, Barone BB, Clark J, Stewart KJ. The effects of an exercise training intervention on hepatic steatosis [Abstract]. Hepatology 2008;48(Suppl.):806A.
104. Johnson NA, Sachinwalla T, Walton DW, Smith K, Armstrong A, Thompson MW, et al. Aerobic exercise training reduces hepatic and visceral lipids in obese individuals without weight loss. Hepatology 2009;50:1105–1112.
105. van der Heijden GJ, Wang ZJ, Chu ZD, Sauer PJ, Haymond MW, Rodriguez LM, et al. A 12-week aerobic exercise program re- duces hepatic fat accumulation and insulin resistance in obese, Hispanic adolescents. Obesity 2010;18:384 –390.
106. Marchesini G, Brizi M, Bianchi G, Tomassetti S, Zoli M, Mel- chionda N. Metformin in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Lancet.
2001;358:893– 4.
107. Uygun A, Kadayifci A, Isik AT, Ozgurtas T, Deveci S, Tuzun A, et al. Metformin in the treatment of patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;19:537– 44.
108. Nair S, Diehl AM, Wiseman M, Farr GH, Jr., Perrillo RP. Metformin in the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a pilot open label trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:23– 8.
109. Bugianesi E, Gentilcore E, Manini R, Natale S, Vanni E, Villanova N, et al. A randomized controlled trial of metformin versus vita- min E or prescriptive diet in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1082–90.
110. Loomba R, Lutchman G, Kleiner DE, Ricks M, Feld JJ, et al.
Clinical trial: pilot study of metformin for the treatment of non- alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009;29:
172–182.
111. Shields WW, Thompson KE, Grice GA, Harrison SA, Coyle WJ. The effect of metformin and standard therapy versus standard ther- apy alone in nondiabetic patients with insulin resistance and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): a pilot study. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2009;2:157– 63.
112. Haukeland JW, Konopski Z, Eggesbø HB, et al. Metformin in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized, controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 2009;44:853– 60.
113. Idilman R, Mizrak D, Corapcioglu D, Bektas M, Doganay B, Sayki M, et al. Clinical trial: insulin-sensitizing agents may reduce consequences of insulin resistance in individuals with non-alco- holic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008;28:200 –
208.
114. Duseja A, Das A, Dhiman RK, Chawla YK, Thumburu KT, Bhadada S, et al. Metformin is effective in achieving biochemical re- sponse in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) not responding to lifestyle interventions. Ann Hepatol 2007;6:
222–226.

115. Nar A, Gedik O. The effect of metformin on leptin in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Acta Diabetol. 2009;46:113– 8.
116. Omer Z, Cetinkalp S, Akyildiz M, Yilmaz F, Batur Y, Yimaz C, Akarca U. Efficacy of insulin-sensitizing agents in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. European J Gastroenterol Hepatology. 2010;
22:18 –23.
117. Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Brunt EM, Wehmeier KR, Oliver D, Ba- con BR. Improved nonalcoholic steatohepatitis after 48 weeks of treatment with the PPAR-gamma ligand rosiglitazone. Hepatol- ogy. 2003;38:1008 –17.
118. Ratziu V, Giral P, Jacqueminet S, Charlotte F, Hartemann-Heurt- ier A, Serfaty L, et al. Rosiglitazone for nonalcoholic steatohepa- titis: one-year results of the randomized placebo-controlled Fatty Liver Improvement with Rosiglitazone Therapy (FLIRT) Trial. Gas- troenterology 2008;135:100 –110.
119. Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Bernhardt C, Giral P, Halbron M, LeNaour G, Hartemann-Heurtier A, Bruckert E and Poynard T for the LIDO Study Group. Long-term efficacy of rosiglitazone in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: results of the fatty liver improvement by rosigli- tazone therapy (FLIRT 2) extension trial. Hepatology 2010;51:
445– 453.
120. Belfort R, Harrison SA, Brown K, Darland C, Finch J, Hardies J, et al. A placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2297–
307.
121. Aithal GP, Thomas JA, Kaye PV, Lawson A, Ryder SD, Spendlove I, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone in nondiabetic subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastro- enterology 2008;135:1176 –1184.
122. Sanyal AJ, Chalasani N, Kowdley KV, McCullough A, Diehl AM, Bass NM, et al. Pioglitazone, vitamin E, or placebo for nonalco- holic steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1675–1685.
123. Lincoff A, Wolski K, Nicholls S, Nissen S: Pioglitazone and risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA 2007;298:1180 –
1188.
124. Hasegawa T, et al. Plasma transforming growth factor-beta1 level and efficacy of alpha-tocopherol in patients with nonalco- holic steatohepatitis: a pilot study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther
2001;15:1667–1672.
125. Harrison SA, et al. Vitamin E and vitamin C treatment improves fibrosis is patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Am J Gas- troenterol 2003;98:2485–2490.
126. Dufour JF, et al. Swiss Association for the Study of the Liver.
Randomized placebo-controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid with vitamin E in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:1537–1543.
127. Sanyal AJ, et al. A pilot study of vitamin E versus vitamin E and pioglitazone for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2:1107–1115.
128. Yakaryilamz F, et al. Effects of vitamin E treatment on peroxi- some proliferator-activated receptor-alpha expression and insu- lin resistance in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, re- sults of a pilot study. Intern Med J 2007;37:229 –235.
129. Bjelakovic G, Gluud LL, Nikolova D, Bjelakovic M, Nagorni A, Gluud C. Meta-analysis: antioxidant supplements for liver dis- ease – the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;32:356 –367.
130. Lavine JE, Schwimmer JB, Van Natta ML, Molleston JP, Murray KF, et al for the Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network. Effect of vitamin E or metformin for treatment of non- alcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents: the TONIC randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2011;305:1659 – 68.
131. Miller ER 3rd, Pastor-Barriuso R, Dalal D, Riemersmara, Appel LJ,
Guallar E. Meta-analysis: high-dosage vitamin E supplementa- tion may increase all-cause mortality. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:
37– 46.
132. Bjelakovic G, Nikolova D, Gluud LL, Simonetti RG, Gluud C.
Mortality in randomized trials of antioxidant supplements of primary and secondary prevention: systematic review and meta- analysis JAMA. 2007 Feb 28;297(8):842–57. Review. Erratum in: JAMA. 2008 Feb 20;299(7):765– 6.
133. Berry D, Wathen JK, Newell M. Bayesian model averaging in meta-analysis: vitamin E supplementation and mortality. Clin Trials 2009;6:28 – 41.
134. Gerss J, Kopcke W. The questionable association of vitamin E supplementation and mortality – inconsistent results of different meta-analytic approaches. Cell Mol Biol 2009;55 Suppl: OL
1111–20.
135. Dietrich M, Jacques PF, Pencina MJ, Lanier K, Keyes MJ, Kaur G, Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, Vasan RS. Vitamin E supplement use and the incidence of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mor- tality in the Framingham Heart Study: Does the underlying health status play a role? Atherosclerosis 2009;205:549 –553.

 

136. Klein EA, Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Crowley JJ, Lucia MS, Goodman PJ, et al. Vitamin E and the risk of prostate cancer. The selenium and vitamin E cancer prevention trial (SELECT). JAMA
2011;306:1549 –1556.
137. Laurin J, Lindor KD, Crippin JS, Gossard A, Gores GJ, Ludwig J, et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid or clofibrate in the treatment of non- alcoholic induced steatohepatitis: a pilot study. Hepatology
1996;23:1464 –1467.
138. Leushner U, Lindenthal B, Herrman G, Arnold JC, Rossle M, Cordes H-J, et al. High-dose Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a double-blind, randomized, place- bo-controlled trial. Hepatology 2010;52:472– 479.
139. Lindor KD, Kowldey KV, Heathcote EJ, Harrison ME, Jorgensen R, Angulo P, et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid for treatment of nonalco- holic steatohepatitis: results of a randomized trial. Hepatology
2004;39:770 –778.
140. Ratziu V, de Ledinghen V, Oberti F, Mathurin P, Wartelle-Bladou C, Renou C, Sogni P, Maynard M, et al. A randomized controlled trial of hig-dose ursogeoxycholic acid for nonalcoholic steato- hepatitis. J Hepatol 2011;54:1011–1019.
141. Capanni M, Calella F, Biagini MR, Genise S, Raimondi L, Bedogni G, Svegliati-Baroni G, Sofi F, Milani S, Abbate R, Surrenti C, Casini A. Prolonged n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementa- tion ameliorates hepatic steatosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a pilot study. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2006;23:1143–51.
142. Masterton GS, Plevris JN, Hayes PC. Review article: omega-3
fatty acids - a promising novel therapy for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2010;31:
679 –92.
143. Mathurin P, Hollebecque A, Arnalsteen L, Buob D, Leteurtre E, Caiazzo R, Pigeyre M, Verkindt H, Dharancy S, Louvet A, Romon M, Pattou F. Prospective study of the long-term effects of bari- atric surgery on liver injury in patients without advanced liver disease. Gastroenterology 2009;137:532–540.
144. Mummadi RR, Kasturi KS, Chennareddygair S, Sood GK. Effect of bariatric surgery on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: system- atic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Gastro and Hepatol 2008;
6:1396 –1402.
145. Chavez-Tapia NC, Tellez-Avila FI, Barrientose-Gutierrez T, Men- dez-Sanchez N, Lizardi-Cervera J, Uribe M. Bariatric surgery for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in obese patients. Cochrane Data- base of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. Art No: CD007340. DOI:10:1002/14641858.
146. http://rethinkingdrinking.niaaa.nih.gov/IsYourDrinkingPattern
Risky/WhatsAtRiskOrHeavyDrinking.asp (Accessed 1/18/2012).
147. Dunn W, Xu R, Schwimmer JB. Modest wine drinking and de- creased prevalence of suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver dis- ease. Hepatology 2008;47:1947–1954.
148. Gunji T, Matsuhashi N, Sato H, Fujibayashi K, Okumura M. Light and moderate alcohol consumption significantly reduces the prevalence of fatty liver in the Japanese male population. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:2189 –2195.
149. Suzuki A, Angulo P, St. Sauver J, Muto A, Okada T, Lindor K. Light to moderate alcohol consumption is associated with lower fre- quency of hypertransaminasemia. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;
102:1912–1919.
150. Moriya A, Iwasaki Y, Ohguchi S, Kayashima E, Mitsumune T, Taniguchi H, Ikeda F, Shiratori Y, Yamamoto K. Alcohol consump- tion appears to protect against non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011;33:378 –388.
151. Dixon JB, Bhathal PS, O’Brien PE. Nonalcoholic fatty liver dis- ease: predictors of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibro- sis in the severely obese. Gastroenterology 2001;121:91–100.
152. Cotrim HP, Freitas LA, Alves E, Almeida A, May DS, Caldwell S.
Effects of light-to-moderate alcohol consumption on steatosis and steatohepatitis in severely obese patients. Eur J Gastroen- terol Hepatol 2009;21:969 –972.
153. Dunn W, Brunt EM, Sanyal AJ, McCullough AJ, Unalp A, Tonascia J, Schwimmer J. Modest alcohol consumption is associated with decreased prevalence of steatohepatitis in patients with nonal- coholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Hepatology 50, 390A. 2009.
154. Chatrath H, Vuppalanchi R, Chalasani N. Dyslipidemia in pa- tients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Seminars in Liver Disease 2012;32:22–29.
155. Chalasani N, Aljadhey H, Kesterson J, Murray MD, Hall SD.
Patients with elevated liver enzymes are not at higher risk for statin hepatotoxicity. Gastroenterology 2004;128:1287–1292.
156. Vuppalanchi R, Teal E, Chalasani N. Patients with elevated base- line liver enzymes do not have higher frequency of hepatotoxicity from lovastatin than those with normal baseline liver enzymes. Am J Med Sci 2005;329:62–5.
157. Chalasani N. Statin hepatotoxicity: focus on statin usage in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2005;41:690 – 695.
158. Browning JD. Statins and hepatic steatosis: perspectives from the Dallas Heart Study. Hepatology 2006;44:466 – 471.
159. Lewis JH, Mortensen ME, Zweig S, Fusco MJ, Medoff JR, Belder R; Pravastatin in Chronic Liver Disease Study Investigators. Ef- ficacy and safety of high-dose pravastatin in hypercholester- olemic patients with well-compensated chronic liver disease: Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled, multicenter trial. Hepatology. 2007;46(5):1453– 63.
160. Horlander JC, Kwo PY, Cummings OW, Koukoulis G. Atorvastatin for the treatment of NASH. Gastroenterology 2001;120 (Supple- ment);2767.
161. Gomer-Dominguez E, Gisbert JP, Moreno-Monteagudo A, Garcia- Buey L, Moreno-Otero R. A pilot study of atorvastatin treatment in dyslipid, non-alcoholic fatty liver patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;23:1643–1647.
162. Antonopoulos S, Mikros S, Mylonopoulos M, Kokkoris M, Gian- noulis G. Rosuvastatin as a novel treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in hyperlipidemic patients. Atherosclerosis
2006;184:233–234.
163. Foster T, Budoff MJ, Saab S, Ahmadi N, Gordon C. Atorvastatin and antioxidants for the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: The St. Francis Heart Study Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106:71–77.
164. Athyros VG, Mikhalidis DP, Didangelos TP, Karagiannis A, Kakafika AI, Tziomalos K, Burroughs AK, Elisaf MS. Effect of multifactorial treatment on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in metabolic syndrome: a randomized study. Curr Med Res Opin
2006;22:872– 883.
165. Athyros VG, Tziomalos K, Gossios TD, Griva T, Anagnostis P, Kargiotis K, Pagourelias ED, Theocharidou E, Karagiannis A, Mikhailidis DP, for the GREACE Study Collaborative Group. Lan- cet 2010; 376; 1916 –1922.
166. Ekstedt M, Franzen L, Mathiesen UL, Holmqvist M, Bodemar G, Kehagias S. Statins in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and chronically elevated liver enzymes: a histopathological follow-up study. J Hepatol 2007;47:135–141.
167. Nelson A, Torres DM, Morgan AE, Fincke C, Harrison SA. A pilot study using simvastatin in the treatment of nonalcoholic steato- hepatitis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Gastroen- terol 2009;43:990 –994.
168. Brunt EM, Ramrakhiani S, Cordes BG, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Janney CG, Bacon BR, Di Bisceglie AM. Concurrence of histolog- ical features of steatohepatitis with other forms of chronic liver disease. Mod Pathol 2003;16:49 –56.
169. Leandro G, Mangia A, Hui J, Fabris P, Rubbia-Brandt L, Colloredo G, et al. Relationship between steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Gastroenterology 2006;130:1636 –1642.
170. Petta S, Camma C, Di Marco V, Macaluso FS, Maida M, Pizzol- anti G, et al. Hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance are asso- ciated with severe fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis caused by HBV or HCV. Liver Int 2011;31:507–5111608 AGA GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 142, No. 7171. Eslam M, Aparcero R, Kawaguchi T, Del Campo JA, Sata M, Khattab MA, Romero-Gomez M. Meta-analysis: insulin resis- tance and sustained virological response in hepatitis C. Alimen Pharmacol Ther 2011;34:297–305.
172. Sorrentino P, Terracciano L, D’Angelo S, Ferbo U, Bracigliano A, Tarantino L, et al. Oxidative stress and steatosis are cofactors of liver injury in primary biliary cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol 2010;45:
1053–1062.
173. Romero-Gomez M, Del Mar Viloria M, Andrade RJ, et al. Insulin resistance impairs sustained response rate to peginterferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients. Gastroenterology
2005;128:636 – 641.
174. Reddy KR, Govindarajan S, Marcellin P, et al. Hepatic steatosis in chronic hepatitis C: baseline host and viral characteristics and influence on response to therapy with peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin. J Viral Hepa 2008;15:129 –136.
175. Negro F, Clements S. Impact of obesity, steatosis and insulin resistance on progression and response to therapy to hepatitis C. J Viral Hepat 2009;16:681– 688.
176. Jacobson IM, McHutchison JG, Dusheiko G, Di Bisceglie A, Reddy KR, Bzowej NH, et al. Telaprevir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med 2011;364;2405–2416.
177. Zeuzam S, Andreone P, Pol S, Lawitz E, Diago M, Roberts S, Focaccia R, et al. Telaprevir for retreatment of HCV infection. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2417–2428.
178. Bacon BR, Gordon SC, Lawtiz E, Marcellin P, Vierling J, Zeuzam
S, Poordad F, et al. Boceprevir for previously treated chronic HCV
genotype 1 infection. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1207–1217.
179. Poordad F, McCone J, Bacon BR, Bruno S, Manns MP, Sulkowski MS, Jacobson IM, et al. Boceprevir for untreated chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. N Engl J Med 2011l 364-1195–1206.
180. Sherman KE, Flamm SL, Afdhal NH, Nelson DR, Sulkowski MS, Everson GT, Fried MW, et al. Response-guided telaprevir combi- nation treatment for hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med
2011;365:1014 –1024.
181. Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal J, Grace ND, Carey WD, for the Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease and the Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Prevention and manage- ment of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:2086 –2102.
182. Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of Hepatocellular carcinoma: An update. Hepatology 2011;Mar;53(3):1020 –2.
183. Schwimmer J, Deutsch R, Kahen T, Lavine JE, Stanley C, Behling C. Prevalence of fatty liver in children and adolescents. Pediat- rics. 2006;118;1388 –1393.
184. Schwimmer JB, Behling C, Newbury R, Deutsch R, Nievergelt C, Schork NJ, Lavine JE. Histopathology of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2005;42:641–9.
185. Feldstein AE, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Treeprasertsuk S, Ben- son JT, Enders FB, Angulo P. The natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children: a follow-up study for up to 20 years. Gut. 2009;58:1538 – 44.
186. Riley MR, Bass NM, Rosenthal P, Merriman RB. Underdiagnosis of pediatric obesity and underscreening for fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome by pediatricians and pediatric subspe- cialists. J Pediatr. 2005;147:839 – 42.
187. Patton H, Lavine JE, Van Natta ML, Schwimmer JB, Kleiner D, Molleston J for the NASH-CRN. Clinical correlates of histopathol- ogy in pediatric nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Gastroen- terology, 2008;135:1961–1971.
188. Barlow SE and the Expert Committee. Expert Committee Recom- mendations Regarding the Preventions, Assessment, and Treat- ment of Child and Adolescent Overweight and Obesity: Summary Report. Pediatrics vol 120, 2007;S164 –192.
189. Loomba R, Sirlin CB, Schwimmer JB, Lavine JE. Advances in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2009;50:
1282–1293.
190. Alkhouri N, Carter-Kent C, Lopez R, Rosenberg WM, Pinzani M, Bedogni G, Feldstein AE, Nobili V. A combination of the pedi- atric NAFLD fibrosis index and enhanced liver fibrosis test identifies children with fibrosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2011;9:150 –5.
191. Nobili V, Parkes J, Bottazzo G, Marcellini M, Cross R, Newman D, Vizzutti F, Pinzani M, Rosenberg WM. Performance oof ELF serum markers in predicting serum fibrosis stage in pediatric non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2009;136:160 –167.
192. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, Behling C, Contos MJ, Cummings OW, Ferrell LD, Liu YC, Torbenson MS, Unalp-Arida A, Yeh M, McCullough AJ, Sanyal AJ; Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network. Design and validation of a histologi- cal scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol- ogy 2005;41:1313–21.
193. Carter-Kent C, Yerian LM, Brunt EM, Angulo P, Kohli R, Ling SC, Xanthakos SA,Whitington PF, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Yap J, Lopez R, McCullough AJ, Feldstein AE. Nonalcoholic steatohepa- titis in children: a multicenter clinicopathological study. Hepatol- ogy. 2009;50:1113–20.
194. Ko JS, Yoon JM, Yang HR, Myung JK, Kim HR, Kang GH, Cheon JE, Seo JK. Clinical and histological features of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:2225–30.
195. Nobili V, Marcellini M, Devito R, Ciampalini P, Piemonte F, Com- parcola D, Sartorelli MR, Angulo P. NAFLD in children: a prospec- tive clinical-pathological study and effect of lifestyle advice. Hepatology 2006;44:458 – 465.
196. Nobili V, Manco M, Devito R, Di Ciommo V, Comparcola D, Sartorelli MR, Piemonte F, et al. Lifestyle intervention and anti- oxidant therapy in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology 2008;48:119 –128.
197. Barlow SE, Dietz WH. Management of child and adolescent obesity: summary and recommendations based on reports from pediatricians, pediatric nurse practitioners, and registered dieti- tians. Pediatrics 2002;110:236 –238.
198. Grundy SM. Cleeman JI. Daniels SR. Donato KA. Eckel RH.
Franklin BA. Gordon DJ. Krauss RM. Savage PJ. Smith SC Jr. Spertus JA. Costa F. American Heart Association. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/Na- tional Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 112(17):2735–52, 2005 Oct 25.